Questions for parliamentary candidates about pandemic management

  1. What is your view on the recent lockdowns, school closures and mask mandates? Would you vote for lockdowns in future?
  2. What is your view on mandatory vaccination – a breach of individual choice or a necessary public health measure?
  3. Do you or have you ever had funding from the pharmaceutical industry?
  4. Why do you think that during the height of the pandemic in the year 2020 there were many weeks where all-cause mortality was at or below average, but in the years since then, it has been above average? If elected, would you support a full independent investigation of excess deaths?
  5. Do you support taxpayer-funded Moderna mRNA technology research for new vaccines? Are the covid vaccines safe and effective and what evidence have you seen? If elected, would you support a full independent investigation of vaccine injuries?
  6. Will you support calls for an independent safety audit of the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)?
  7. What is your view on the proposed WHO treaty changes? Should the WHO simply advise, or should it be able to enforce compliance by individual states to centrally made decisions? Would you vote against Britain adopting the new WHO Treaty and regulations?
  8. What if the Whip orders you to vote contrary to the wishes of your constituency? Would you be willing to vote against your Party? Is your loyalty to the Party or to your constituents?
  9. Are you concerned about corruption and conflicts of interest in public life, particularly regarding drug approvals and drug safety monitoring?
  10. Are you aware of doctors being prevented from speaking out about vaccine harms? What would you do to protect whistleblowers?

Re: People’s Vaccine Inquiry – Covid-19 Vaccines

I strongly encourage you to visit the People’s Vaccine Inquiry website where you can read detailed and fully referenced statements from experts from the medical and scientific fields and listen to their short video summary presentations of evidence and data that has been heavily censored in the mainstream media but which is in the public domain. 

The People’s Vaccine Inquiry comprises expert groups who were invited to submit Witness Statements to the Covid-19 Public Inquiry Module 4 (Vaccines), and others with relevant expertise.  The medical professionals who took part in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry believe it is in the public interest to urgently facilitate access to expert opinion and relevant clinical observations – for both the medical profession and the public – to allow informed consent and protect patient safety.

They argue that, during the Covid era, there has been a failure of public health to ensure the public had a full picture of the potential known and unknown risks of the Covid vaccines to enable informed consent, and that the insufficiently tested Covid vaccines were rolled out in a way that violated fundamental principles of medical ethics.


3 responses to “Questions for parliamentary candidates about pandemic management”

  1. Terrific. I’ll circulate.

  2. In fact, the more I see these deceitful politicians, so-called HCPs and the mainstream media, the more angry I get. I realize you are focusing on covid and the vaccines here, and more power to your elbow, but there are other areas being swept along in the same torrent of disdain for the ordinary man and woman. Net Zero and the WHO debacle for example.

  3. We should have a protest before the election to demand an inquiry about the eccess deaths.
    All political parties should be aware through mainstream media that we’re looking for answers.
    What does the future look like for us and our families. Are we going down the road of mandatory vaccines?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *